Springer, pp 292–302ĭougherty C (2012) Practical identification of SQL injection vulnerabilities, Carnegie Mellon University. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3089. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on software testing and analysis (STA), July 2009īoyd SW, Keromytis AD (2004) SQLrand: preventing SQL injection attacks. Halfond WGJ, Anand S, Orso A (2009) Precise interface identification to improve testing and analysis of web applications. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on dynamic analysis (WODA), May 2005 Halfond WGJ, Orso A (2005) Combining static analysis and runtime monitoring to counter SQL-injection attacks. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on secure software engineering, Mar 2006 To alleviate the security threat, many vulnerability mining methods based on static and dynamic analysis have been developed. Halfond WGJ, Viegas J, Orso A (2006) A classification of SQL injection attacks and countermeasures. Buffer overflow vulnerability is the most common and serious type of vulnerability in software today, as network security issues have become increasingly critical. This book provides specific, real code examples on exploiting buffer. “Buffer-Overflow Vulnerabilities and Attacks”, in Lecture Notes, Syracuse University. A buffer overflow is an unexpected behavior that exists in certain programming languages. This paper explains buffer overflow attack vulnerabilities and the preventives measures that can be taken to protect it from the attackers. In: Lecture Notes on Computer and Network Security, Purdue University, 2 April 2015 Buffer overflow and SQL injection are still biggest security problems in software and web applications, respectively, that will exist in future for long time due to large amount of legacy code. Shaneck M (2003) An overview of buffer overflow vulnerabilities and internet worms. To achieve real-world buffer overflow protection, a practical solution should meet the following requirements: (R1) transparency to existing applications, OS and hardware (R2) no requirement to restart the protected program (R3) the ability to handle different types of buffer overflow (R4) moderate performance overhead (R5) ese of use. In: Proceedings of DARPA information survivability conference and expo (DISCEX)įoster JC, Osipov V, Bhalla N, Heinen N (2005) Buffer overflow attacks detect, exploit, prevent. Wiley, Hoboken, NJĬowan C, Wagle P, Pu C, Beattie S, Walpole J Buffer overflows: attacks and defenses for the vulnerability of the decade. Stamp M (2006) Information security principles and practices.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |